翻译语体样例(style samples)
本文件是翻译语体的校准锚点:每组样例是一段英文原文与一段人工定稿的中文译文,覆盖本仓库文档的主要文体。译文的语体以这些样例为准——文体样例的效力高于对语气的文字描述,但术语表、忠实性与结构规则仍然优先。翻译或评审时对照最接近的文体样例。本文件中英对照、自成双语,不参与配对(见 README.md 排除清单)。
维护方式:人工评审校准出新的金标段落后追加到对应文体;发现语义、结构或术语错误时直接修正。新增或修正样例都需经过 PR 评审。
① 架构叙述
This document describes the architecture of the DeepSeek Harness — the foundation of DeepSeek Code. The governing principle, from the microkernel design discussion: everything is a plugin. The core is deliberately tiny — a handful of abstract services plus one concrete loop plugin (
dsh-agent-loop) — and every product feature is a plugin against the extension API described here, without modifying the loop.
本文介绍 DeepSeek Harness 整体架构,它是 DeepSeek Code 的底层基座。微内核设计讨论中确立了核心设计准则:一切皆插件。内核刻意做得极精简,仅包含少量抽象服务,外加一个实体循环插件 dsh-agent-loop。所有产品功能均基于本文定义的扩展接口开发为独立插件,无需改动主循环逻辑。
Dependency rule: extension plugins depend on interfaces, never on
dsh-agent-loop(the loop is swappable); the sanctioned exception is the composition bundledsh-agent-spine-demo, whose job is assembling the concrete spine.
依赖约束规范:各类扩展插件仅依赖抽象接口,严禁直接依赖 dsh-agent-loop(该主循环支持替换实现);唯一允许的特例是组合包 dsh-agent-spine-demo,它的职责是组装整套实体主干。
This document covers behavior; type definitions live in subsystems/, the per-event/service reference lives in the generated regions of subsystems/, and package contracts in the package READMEs state each package's required configuration and behavior (map).
本文档描述整体行为逻辑;类型定义存放于 subsystems/;各类事件、服务的详细参考见 subsystems/ 中的生成区块;相应的 README 说明每个包(package)要求的配置和行为(索引)。
② 防御模式规则
Hard-won bug-class rules: each pattern below is a class of defect that actually shipped or nearly shipped here, stated as the rule that prevents its recurrence. Read this before writing lifecycle, concurrency, subprocess, or teardown code.
这些都是踩坑总结得出的缺陷分类规范:下文每种范式都对应一类曾上线、或险些流入线上的问题,每条规范旨在杜绝同类问题复现。编写生命周期、并发、子进程、资源销毁相关代码前,请务必阅读本文档。
Dispose must reach quiescence, not just request it — A teardown that issues kills/aborts but returns before the work stops leaves orphans. Make cleanup async and await the children's exit (kill → await
done), and close listener/notification registries BEFORE killing so late completions stay silent. Tests prove disposal waited (pid gone right afterawait fiber.dispose()), not merely that the process eventually dies.
dispose(资源释放)必须等待所有任务完全停稳,不能仅下发终止指令就返回:如果清理过程只发出终止或中断信号,却不等任务停止就返回,就会留下孤儿进程。清理应采用异步方式,等待所有子任务彻底退出(先发出终止信号,再等待退出);发出信号前应先关闭监听器与通知注册表,使延迟到达的完成事件不再触发通知。测试要证明 dispose 的确等到清理完成:执行完 await fiber.dispose() 后进程 PID 立即消失,不能只检查进程最终会自行消亡。
Async state is not synchronous state —
agent.followup()does not flip status before returning; a background job's completion races turn boundaries;reader.close()fires for both EOF and disposal. Never gate control flow on a status you only just requested — drive lifecycle off the events/promises that actually fire (agent/status,task.done), and observe the transition (sawrunningTHENidle) instead of treating status as a per-follow-up result: several queued follow-ups run as consecutive turns under onerunninginterval, while cancellation or disposal can discard unstarted items.
异步状态不等同于同步瞬时状态:调用 agent.followup() 不会在返回前同步更新状态;后台任务的完成时间与轮次边界存在竞态;reader.close() 既会在读到文件末尾时触发,也会在资源释放时触发。切勿把刚刚发起的状态变更当成已经生效,据此控制流程;生命周期逻辑应以实际触发的事件和已完成的 promise(agent/status、task.done)为准,并观察完整的状态变化(先 running,再 idle),不要把状态当作逐次 followup() 的结果:多次排队的 followup() 会作为连续轮次运行,但可能共用一个 running 区间;取消或资源释放还可能丢弃尚未启动的队列项。
③ 测试政策清单
Coverage gate (
pnpm run test:coverage): the gating run, per-file 100% onpackages/*/*/src. An uncovered line is often dead code the gate is correctly flagging for deletion, not a missing test to bolt on. Line coverage is necessary, never sufficient — it proves lines ran, not that the feature works as shipped.
覆盖率门禁(pnpm run test:coverage):作为合入门禁校验,要求 packages/*/*/src 目录下每个文件行覆盖率达到 100%。未覆盖代码行大多是无用死代码,门禁标记这类代码是提示删除,而非单纯补充测试。行覆盖率是必要条件,但远不充分:它仅能证明代码被执行过,无法保证功能符合线上预期。
We are DeepSeek — do not ration real-API tests. A no-key test proves the plumbing; only a with-key run proves the agent works against a real model. Write many: real prompts that write files, multi-turn conversations, tool use, cancellation mid-stream. Cheapest and highest-value are smoke tests that boot the real example, send one real prompt, and check the world — they catch the "green unit tests, broken product" class that mocks structurally cannot. The self-skip exists only so secretless CI and keyless contributors aren't blocked; it is not a cost signal.
我们是 DeepSeek:真实接口相关测试不得刻意缩减用例数量。无密钥测试仅能验证底层通路;只有携带有效密钥执行的用例,才能确认 agent(智能体)可正常对接真实模型。请大量编写此类测试:包含文件写入类真实提示词、多轮对话、工具调用、流式中途取消等场景。
成本最低、收益最高的是冒烟测试:拉起完整真实示例,发送一条真实提示,并检查文件、进程等外部可观察结果。这类用例能捕获一类问题——单元测试全部绿灯,但产品实际运行故障,单靠 mock 完全无法发现这类缺陷。
自带自动跳过逻辑,仅用于保障无密钥 CI 环境、无权限贡献者不会被流程拦截,不代表可以以此为由削减真实接口测试投入。
Prefer the real implementation over a mock — Mock only genuinely expensive or non-deterministic dependencies (the LLM adapter, the network, the clock); keep everything downstream real. A hand-rolled stand-in proves the bridge moves bytes, not that the shipping tool behaves as asserted — the two drift while the test stays green.
优先使用真实实现,而非 mock 替身——仅对开销极大、结果不确定的依赖做 mock(LLM(大语言模型)适配器、网络、时钟),其余下游组件全部使用真实实现。手写的 mock 替身只能验证数据通路能传输字节,无法保证线上工具符合预期逻辑;长期下来业务逻辑与 mock 实现会出现偏差,但测试仍会显示通过。
④ 机制描述
Blob hashes, not commit hashes, so the record is computable for files edited in the same PR (
git hash-object foo.md) and consistency is a pure content comparison. The recorded hash also recovers the exact last-confirmed text of either side (git cat-file -p <hash>), so an out-of-sync pair is updated by diffing the edited side against its last-confirmed state and patching the counterpart minimally — never by re-translating whole files.
系统采用文件 blob hash 而非 commit hash 记录状态。同一 PR 内修改文件时,可通过 git hash-object foo.md 直接算出对应 blob hash,仅对比文件内容即可判断双语文档是否同步。通过记录的 blob hash,可使用 git cat-file -p <hash> 还原上次确认对齐时两侧的原文。当双语文档不一致时,只需对比修改版本与上次确认版本的差异,最小幅度同步修改另一侧译文,无需全文重新翻译。
⑤ 政策声明
The gate's limit, stated plainly: a green gate means the pair was confirmed consistent at these exact contents, not that the confirmation was sound. It checks hashes and Markdown structure; it cannot judge whether the two sides actually say the same thing — that is the reviewer's half of the contract. A re-recorded pair with a sloppy counterpart passes the gate; it must not pass review.
门禁的限制很明确:通过门禁只说明两侧文件当前的 blob hash 与伴随记录吻合,并且 Markdown 结构签名一致,也就是说,这组内容曾被确认一致;它不代表这次确认可靠。评审人必须检查两种语言是否真正表达了相同的意思。即使译文粗糙、表意有误,重新记录配对后仍能通过门禁,但绝不能通过人工评审。
⑥ Agent Note 论证
Comparing git timestamps of the pair (no record) — rejected: formatting-only edits would false-positive, and a counterpart committed after an unrelated edit would false-negative; content identity is the only signal that means what the gate claims.
对比双语文件的 git 时间戳(无记录方案)——不予采纳:仅调整格式的改动会触发误报,无关修改后再提交译文又会造成漏检。只有基于内容本身的标识(每侧文件的 blob hash 与伴随记录比对),才能承载门禁所声称的语义。
⑦ 统一要求(长段拆分示范)
Universal requirement: every in-scope document merges as a complete bilingual pair. The manifest contains only explicit exclusions: it has no per-file rollout list, date cutoff, or README-specific policy class. […] Pairing is a continuing obligation: every later edit to either side updates the counterpart and consistency record in the same change.
统一要求:每篇纳入范围的文档合入时都必须构成完整的双语配对。manifest(元数据清单)只包含显式排除项:其中没有逐文件推进清单、日期分界或 README 专用政策类别。(……)配对是一项持续义务:后续修改任一侧时,都必须在同一变更中同步更新对侧文件和一致性记录。
从样例提炼的要点
- 语体是规范制度文:完整主谓、确定语气;不口语化,也不学术腔。
- 给句子补显式执行主体:英文的被动句和抽象主语,中文写成「系统/门禁/工具/评审人」做主语。
- 用中文工程惯用语替换直译:false positive/negative→误报/漏检、ratchet→只向前收紧不倒退放宽、reviewable act→评审凭证。
- 隐喻本地化而非移植:bilingual from birth→从创建起就要求双语齐备;grandfathered→历史存量遗留。
- 类别名词说中文并在首现括注英文:实操手册(cookbook)、事故复盘(postmortem);指目录或路径时保留代码体英文。
- 长段按语义单元拆段,一段一件事;名词短语展开为动词句。
- 母语重写不等于删减:原文每个语义成分都要落地。
- 样例与 terminology.md 冲突时,以术语表为准:收录样例前按表修正术语(例如 agent、mock、LLM 保留英文,cancellation 译「取消」)。
- 代码体标识符(事件名
agent/status、状态值running、包名dsh-bash-local等)在译文中保留 code span 原文,不得口语化改写;Pass 2 必须逐句核验。